| |
Material:
Design considerations
The geosynthetic design included the following components installed
on the prepared dam face, as detailed by geo-technical engineer
Norm Bishop of Stone & Webster:
•
a nonwoven geotextile protective under- layer (16 oz./yd²);
•
a 45-mil reinforced poly-propylene geomembrane;
•
a nonwoven geotextile pro-tective over-layer (16 oz./yd.²);
•
a 75-mm (3-in.) tendoned, perforated Geoweb? cellular confinement
system;
•
a 75-mm (3-in.) poured-in-place concrete veneer facing element
protecting the un-derlying geomembrane.
The geosynthetic solution was chosen for three reasons, according
to John Heap, Pres-ident of Colorado Lining In-ternational. "First,
it saved cost. The client saved be- tween $600,000-$700,000 over
conventional reinforced-concrete methods. Second, it provided a
waterproof pro-tection to the dam face, the client has a system
that will conserve more water and will
function for a long, long time." The third reason, added Heap,
was constructability. "Custom-made geomembrane panels were
precut and welded offsite, significantly re-ducing construction
time, as well as limit-ing exposure to natural degradation ele-ments
and eliminating the need for special construction equipment."
The geocell slope-protection system with integral tendons and ATRA?
clips was specified as the geomembrane-protection system. The tendons
allowed the geocell
sections to be anchored at the crest of the slope, secured to a
deadman anchor system and suspended over the geomembrane. "When
anchoring with traditional stakes is not possible, as in this case,
integral tendons and load-transfer clips allow the geocell system
to be suspended over the geomembrane without jeopardizing its integrity," Samuel
Randolph of Soil Stabilization Products Co. notes. "This method
enables a system that directly protects the geomembrane from accidental
puncturing and natural degradation." |
|
|
|